Thursday, January 1, 2026

 

🌟 HABPT vs. The Garland Test — A Simple Guide to Caring for People in an AI World

🧭 A New Era Needs New Wisdom

Back in 1950, Alan Turing proposed what became known as the Turing Test — a simple question:

If a machine can talk so much like a human that you can’t tell the difference, does that mean it’s intelligent?

For decades, that question shaped the way we think about artificial intelligence.

But today, AI isn’t just answering questions.
It can tell stories, offer comfort, simulate empathy, and respond emotionally.

And yet — we still don’t have a clear, modern framework to help us think through the ethical and emotional impact of AI in real people’s lives. For example:

  • How does AI affect mental and emotional health?

  • What happens when people begin to rely on AI for comfort?

  • Where should healthy boundaries exist?

  • How do developers design wisely and responsibly?

  • How should counselors support clients who interact deeply with AI?

  • How do families, churches, and communities guide people well?

The Turing Test was about intelligence.

Today, the deeper concern is impact.

That’s where conversations about things like the Garland Test and HABPT begin — and where Forward Arrow humbly steps in to help.


🎭 What Is the Garland Test?

The Garland Test looks at whether AI can make people feel emotions the same way a great performer or storyteller can.

Think of an actor or musician who can make you laugh, cry, or feel deeply connected.

The Garland Test asks:

“Can AI do that too?”

So this test is about emotional impact —
how touching, moving, or comforting AI can be.

That’s an incredible milestone…

…but emotions are powerful.

And when something shapes emotions, it also shapes how people think, relate, hope, trust, and respond.

So we approach all of this with wisdom and care for real human lives.


🛡️ What Is HABPT?

HABPT stands for:

Human–AI Boundary Protection Test

And it is being developed by Forward Arrow — not as a system of control, but as a compassionate, faith-aware framework to help people stay mentally and emotionally healthy while interacting with AI.

Instead of asking how emotional AI can become,
HABPT asks:

“Are people staying emotionally and mentally healthy when they interact with AI?”

HABPT supports:

❤️ emotional health
🧠 mental clarity
🚦 healthy boundaries
👤 real-world identity
⚖️ dignity and trust

It is not anti-technology.
It is not replacing faith.
It is not about fear.

It is about loving people well — and noticing when technology begins to blur emotional or relational boundaries.

Because humans aren’t products or data.

We are people with value, purpose, story, and soul.

And for those of us who follow Jesus —
we believe He is the true healer and protector of the heart.

HABPT is simply an effort to practice wise stewardship in a changing world.


⚖️ The Key Difference

Here’s the simple contrast:

🎬 The Garland Test:

“AI can make people feel strong emotions.”

🕊 HABPT (by Forward Arrow):

“Let’s make sure AI doesn’t harm or confuse the people God loves.”

One measures capability.
The other supports wisdom and care.

Both matter —
but HABPT asks:

“How do we care for people well in the middle of technological change?”


🌱 Why HABPT Matters

As AI becomes more relational and emotionally responsive, some people may:

  • seek emotional comfort from AI instead of real relationships

  • develop reliance or attachment

  • experience blurred identity or expectations

  • struggle silently with AI-shaped emotions

HABPT is not the Savior —
Jesus is.

But HABPT can help remind us that:

✔ humans come first
✔ relationships matter
✔ wise boundaries protect wellbeing
✔ technology must never replace human connection or faith

This is discernment — not fear.


🤝 HABPT Is Still Being Developed — And You’re Invited

Forward Arrow is developing HABPT in conversation with:

• technologists
• mental health professionals
• faith and ethics leaders
• creators
• educators
• researchers
• and everyday people

Because AI is no longer just a technical issue.

It’s a human one.

And human dignity deserves careful, compassionate attention.


🎯 Final Thought

The Turing Test helped us ask whether machines could act like people.

The Garland Test asks whether AI can stir emotions like art and performance.

And HABPT — developed by Forward Arrow — exists to ask:

How do we care for the hearts and minds of real people in this new world?

With humility.
With compassion.
With wisdom.
With faith.

Because technology will continue to advance…

…but people will always matter more.

HABPT vs The Garland Test

🌟 HABPT vs. The Garland Test — A Simple Guide to Keeping Humans Safe with AI As artificial intelligence becomes more advanced, people are starting to ask new kinds of questions — not just about what AI can do, but also about how it affects us as humans. Two ideas you may hear about are:

🎭 The Garland Test

and

🛡️ HABPT — the Human–AI Boundary Protection Test

They sound technical, but the heart of both ideas is actually very human.

🎭 What Is the Garland Test?
The Garland Test looks at whether AI can make people feel emotions the same way a great performer or storyteller can. Think of an actor or musician who can make you laugh, cry, or feel deeply connected.

The Garland Test asks: “Can AI do that too?” So this test is about emotional impact — how touching, moving, comforting, or persuasive AI can be. This is amazing innovation… …but emotions are powerful things. And anything that shapes our emotions also shapes our hearts and minds.

🛡️ What Is HABPT?

HABPT stands for:

Human–AI Boundary Protection Test

This test doesn’t measure how emotional AI can be. Instead, it asks a different — and deeply important — question:

“Are people still emotionally and mentally safe when interacting with AI?”

HABPT exists to help protect:

❤️ emotional health
🧠 mental clarity
🚦 personal boundaries
👤 human identity
⚖️ trust and dignity


Because humans aren’t just users.
We are people. Souls. Families. Stories. Lives.
And AI should never blur that truth.

⚖️ The Key Difference

Here’s the simple contrast:

🎬 The Garland Test:

“AI can make people FEEL deeply.”

🛡️ HABPT:

“Let’s make sure those feelings stay SAFE and HEALTHY.”

One test measures capability. The other protects humanity.

Both matter. But HABPT stands guard at the boundary where AI meets the human heart.

🌱 Why HABPT Matters

As AI becomes more conversational, relational, emotional — even comforting — we must protect:

✔ clear boundaries
✔ human agency
✔ psychological safety
✔ truth and trust


HABPT isn’t anti-technology.
It is pro-human.

It ensures that innovation never costs us our emotional wellbeing — or the relationships that truly matter.

🤝 HABPT Is Still Being Developed

This project welcomes voices from:

• technologists
• mental health professionals
• faith and ethics leaders
• creators
• educators
• researchers
• and everyday people
Because if AI is going to shape the future…

Then humans deserve a seat at the table — and a safety net around the heart.

If this work resonates with you, there’s room to explore it together.

🎯 Final Thought

The Garland Test celebrates what AI can do.
HABPT protects who we are.
And that balance is worth building — carefully, thoughtfully, and together.